Lawsuit Challenging Clayton Smoking Ban in Public Parks Cites Groucho Marx, Peace Pipes

Categories: Smoking Bans
duck soup.jpg
Outdoor smoking bans? Groucho would not approve, or would he?
Civil liberties attorney Bevis Schock yesterday followed through with his plan first reported last month by Daily RFT. Schock has filed a federal lawsuit against Clayton, challenging the St. Louis suburb's smoking ban in public parks.

The Clayton lawyer had been hoping to get several Clayton residents to sue but, in the end, settled on just one. He is Arthur Gallagher, a 55-year-old retired vineyard owner from California, who says he enjoys smoking a cigar every day in Concordia Park across from Kaldi's coffee shop on DeMun.

As we previously reported, the suit claims that the Clayton law regarding outdoor smoking violates constitutional rights and infringes on ancient American traditions involving the pursuit of happiness, i.e. smoking peace pipes.

The lawsuit begins by quoting the following song from the Marx brothers' film Duck Soup, in which Groucho Marx plays a dictator bent on establishing laws denying personal freedoms in the mythical, and ironically named, country of Freedonia. 

These are the laws of my administration:
No one's allowed to smoke
Or tell a dirty joke --
And whistling is forbidden...

If chewing gum is chewed,
The chewer is pursued
And in the hoosegow hidden...

If any form of pleasure is exhibited
Report to me and it will be prohibited.
I'll put my foot down;
So shall it be -
This is the land of the free.
.
An attorney for Clayton tells the Post-Dispatch that the Groucho Marx reference "is telling evidence of the merits of the case."

Schock, meanwhile, also argues in the suit that car exhaust from nearby roadways, general smog from manufacturing, and barbecue grills inside city parks pose as great or greater harm than cigar or cigarette smoking inside Clayton's public green ways.

The suit (viewable in its entirety below) asks the court to nullify Clayton's smoking ban inside public parks, which first went into effect January 1 of this year. It also asks for reasonable attorney fees and $100 in damages for Gallagher.

gallagher v. clayton

My Voice Nation Help
4 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Bill Hannegan
Bill Hannegan

We advertised to give folks a chance to join in. We didn't need the ad to bring the challenge. But Clayton residents were too afraid of the retribution of Clayton officials. Like in Ballwin, Clayton officials can be thugs.

STLNEWSMOD
STLNEWSMOD

How are they "thugs"? Wonks, maybe. But thugs?

Bill Hannegan
Bill Hannegan

They make life miserable for you if you oppose them. For instance, bar owners get raided, busted and fined if there are patrons in the bar one minute past 1:30 AM.

Now Trending

St. Louis Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...