Should Missouri Subsidize Lead Company That Poisoned Town and Is Owned by Billionaire?

Thumbnail image for doerun.jpg
Photo: Jennifer Silverberg
Outside the Doe Run smelter in Herculaneum.
Note: A couple clarifications appear at the end of this article.

The Herculaneum-based lead smelter, Doe Run, made news twice this week for two wildly different issues.

On Tuesday, a trial began in St. Louis Circuit Court in which sixteen families from Herculaneum are suing the former owners of the Doe Run smelter on claims that pollution from the facility poisoned them, resulting in depression, asthma, learning disorders and other afflictions.

A day later -- in Jefferson City -- state legislators proposed a plan to provide tax incentives to Doe Run to build a new, low-emission facility in Herculaneum. State Senator Ryan McKenna, a Democrat from the nearby town of Crystal City, said it would "devastate" Herculaneum if the smelter were to relocate somewhere else.

Umm, pardon us, but it seems Doe Run has done a pretty good job devastating Herculaneum on its own.

Drive through the town located along the Mississippi River in Jefferson County, and you'll see vacant lot after vacant lot where homes used to be. Doe Run was required to purchase those properties and demolish them after the soil on which they sat tested dangerously high for lead.

herculaneum 2.jpg
What were residential streets surrounding the Doe Run smelter have given way to green space.
As recently as 2009, the EPA found that one-third of properties situated within a mile of the Doe Run's smelter contained lead at levels exceeding 400 parts per million (ppm) -- the EPA's threshold for removing and replacing such soils.

Last October Doe Run announced it would close its Herculaneum smelter by 2013 instead of trying to bring the facility into regulatory compliance. Based on its repeated citations, Doe Run is now spending $65 million to correct violations of environmental laws at ten of its lead mining, milling and smelting facilities in Missouri.

The record in Peru, where Doe Run operated a mining site in the town of La Oroya, is even worse. That site has been named one of the ten most polluted areas in the world. (The Doe Run Company ceded ownership of La Oroya mine in 2007. The mine now operates independently as Doe Run Peru.)

Then there's this: Doe Run and its Peruvian sister company are currently owned by The Renco Group, a privately held company founded and controlled by New York billionaire Ira Rennert. Forbes recently ranked Rennert as No. 144 on its list of the richest people in the world, estimating him to be worth $5.4 billion. He's also known for building one of the largest private residences in America. His Southhampton home is 110,000 square feet and estimated to be worth $200 million.

So, then, back to the question: Based on their track record, do Doe Run and Ira Rennert really need public subsidies from the state of Missouri?

Clarifications: This article originally stated that the lawsuit in St. Louis Circuit Court involves the Doe Run company. While technically correct. The lawsuit is, in fact, against the three companies that owned Doe Run in 1994 and not the current ownership of the smelter. Those former owners are Fluor Corp.; Doe Run Investment Holding Corp.; and A.T. Massey Coal Co. 

The original article also referred to La Oroya mine in Peru as an "affiliate" of Doe Run. The two companies are no longer part of each other, although they're owned by the same company in the Renco Group.
Keep up on all the latest St. Louis news and gossip by following @chadgarrison on Twitter and Daily RFT on Facebook.

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
Corporate Socialism
Corporate Socialism

Doe Run will build the smelter in Herculaneum, state subsidy or not.  All of their domestic production is located nearby in Missouri’s lead belt.  Lead is heavy and expensive to ship – Herculaneum makes the most economic sense.  Plus, where else would they build it, Illinois?  Good luck – their environmental laws are far stricter than Missouri’s. The “tax break” is nothing more than a handout to Doe Run disguised as “pro business”, “pro growth”, or whatever other label is used to mask what is actually going on – taxpayers subsiding a business doing something the business would do anyway.  Where is my tax break for living in St. Louis, a city rapidly losing population and business?  If they get one, I want one too! 

J. Brad Hicks
J. Brad Hicks

1) The sheer number of children that Doe Run has crippled and/or murdered makes them the only local company I have ever felt deserved to be a target for terrorism. Subsidized? I think they should be fire-bombed. Preferably with the corporate executives inside.

2) The intensity with which the residents of Herculaneum protect the company that is crippling their children is a painfully ironic demonstration of the effects of lead poisoning on intelligence.


While I certainly can understand your sentiment and may even agree with the premise that we shouldn't subsidize "billionaires", the reality in today's business development endeavors is incentives or subsidies in one form or another have to be offered or the opportunity will be lost to another community. That community may or may not be within Missouri, it may not even be within the United States. It hurts to be held hostage but it is a reality. I certainly can agree that we should not subsidize or attempt to attract those busineses which would harm our residents, either willingly or through negilgence.

Now Trending

St. Louis Concert Tickets

From the Vault