Top

blog

Stories

 

Judge Dismisses Lawsuit vs. Backpage.com

Categories: Media
Thumbnail image for Gavel01.jpg
A federal judge in St. Louis on Monday dismissed a lawsuit filed last year against Riverfront Times' parent company, Village Voice Media Holdings, and its online classified site, backpage.com.

The suit, filed on behalf of an unidentified 14-year-old girl, alleged that the company and its classified site knowing allowed a convicted pimp, Latasha Jewell McFarland, to purchase online ads soliciting the minor for sex.

In dismissing the lawsuit, U.S. Magistrate Thomas Mummert acknowledged what VVM has argued all along: that VVM is protected by the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which states websites cannot be held accountable for what others post on them.

Wrote Mummert in his dismissal:
Plaintiff artfully and eloquently attempts to phrase her allegations to avoid the reach of (the act). Those allegations, however, do not distinguish the complained-of actions of Backpage fromany other website that posted content that led to an innocent person's injury. Congress has declared such websites to be immune from suits arising from such injuries. It is for Congress to change the policy that gave rise to such immunity.


Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
5 comments
Kingpintoo
Kingpintoo

RFT is owned by the same company that owns backpage.com.  Boy they must be proud of themselves, scumbags.

Hugh
Hugh

Sweet, I'm gonna order up a couple hookers from Backpage tonight to celebrate.  

Lord Byron
Lord Byron

Sore teenage sex slaves, take note: Mike Lacey is celebrating this decision by purchasing an ad for his two and a half inches.

Now Trending

St. Louis Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...