St. Louis Alderman Says Plan to Shrink Board Designed to Keep "Negroes" In Check
![]() |
| Image via |
| Alderman Samuel Moore of the 4th Ward: No to shrinking the board! |
It's an interesting concept -- at least as it was fleshed out for us last week by Aldermen Scott Ogilvie of the 24th Ward.
But not everybody in City Hall backs it.
Yesterday, Aldermen Samuel Moore of the 4th Ward the told us what he thought of the idea. (Spoiler: He freaking hates it).
Daily RFT: So you oppose shrinking the Board of Aldermen?
Alderman Samuel Moore: I'm totally opposed to it. We're the first line of defense. We're the direct connect to the people. We are the boots on ground.
The state senators and state reps don't have that direct connect. We do. We have to live right where the people live. If people are complaining, we can't run off to Jefferson city. We're right there, all the time.
But that's the job description the supporters want to change. Shrinking the board, they're saying, will force the remaining aldermen to leave stuff like trash collection to city service providers, thereby freeing up the aldermen to concentrate on bigger policy issues.
![]() |
| Image via |
Service providers - some of 'em - are just riding around, slumping down in their seats, doing nothing.
[My constituents] call me about police matters. They say, 'Alderman, there's a shooting over here.' My reply is, 'I don't have my bullet-proof vest on, nor helmet. Did you call 911?'
They say, 'Yeah, they're taking too long.' So you see what's going on.
[My constituents] don't call the Citizens' Service Bureau. They don't call the neighborhood stabilization officer. They don't call the nuisance compliance officer. They don't call the building inspector. They call the alderman.
When you tell them it's not your job, that you're not the service provider, they get mad and tell you they won't vote for you again.
But that's just it: This shrinkage wouldn't take effect until 2021.
































