Relax, Liberals. Akin's "Dog" Comment is Not Offensive.

Categories: Animals, Politics
Image via
Todd Akin has likened Claire McCaskill's behavior to "one of those dogs"
In slavish devotion to the "Todd-Akin-says-offensive-things" narrative, news blogs are blowing up with the comment that the Congressman made about incumbent Senator Claire McCaskill at a Springfield fundraiser on Saturday: 

"She goes to Washington, D.C., it's a little bit like one of those dogs, 'fetch,' she goes to Washington, D.C., and get all of these taxes and red tape and bureaucracy and executive orders and agencies and brings all of this stuff and dumps it on us in Missouri. It seems to me that she's got it just backwards. What we should be doing is taking the common sense we see in Missouri and taking that to Washington, D.C., and blessing them with more solutions instead of more problems."

Yes, in Akin's analogy, McCaskill plays the part of a labrador retriever. But that's not why it's outrageous. 

What was indeed outrageous was his suggestion last month that McCaskill was not acting "ladylike" when she came out swinging in a debate. Wrong, Todd-O. Women are perfectly capable of rolling up their sleeves and playing hardball when necessary. 

Which is why McCaskill backers can't really get hot and bothered about this most recent "dog" comment and remain consistent. If Akin had compared a male opponent to a dog, nobody would've blinked. Campaign etiquette doesn't change simply because she's a lady, remember? Plus he wasn't saying she looked like "one of those dogs," but that he was saying she has acted like one.  

But she hasn't acted like one, and therein lies the real stupidity of his comment: It makes no sense. 

When you tell a dog "fetch," you want the dog to retrieve something for you. In Akin's brain, Missouri told McCaskill fetch, she brought back "taxes and red tape and bureaucracy and executive orders and agencies." So we told her to go get that stuff, but we didn't really want it. Huh?  And how does a Senator "fetch" an executive order, which the president makes unilaterally? We repeat: This is a dumb analogy. 

Yes, McCaskill voted for Obamacare, which will indeed bring more taxes (for citizens who snub the individual mandate and refuse to buy insurance) and bureaucracy (to set up the new exchanges and ensure companies are offering adequate plans to their employees). 

At the same time, she's fought against government waste by declaring war on earmarks, and on waste and abuse by government contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

She does favor of Keystone pipeline running through Missouri, under the theory that if it's going to happen, it might as well "fetch" money and jobs to our state. But she's taken this position at considerable political risk, because many Democratic constituents fear the overall environmental impact of the pipeline.  

That's the risk a centrist politician takes -- a risk Todd Akin will never have to worry about. 

McCaskill's campaign should combat Akin's analogy with facts, not feign outrage as if female candidates are delicate flowers who hear one canine analogy and require smelling salts. 

We know from her record she's a tough lady. We trust she'll continue to act like it.   

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help

"If Akin had compared a male opponent to a dog, nobody would've blinked. Campaign etiquette doesn't change simply because she's a lady, remember?" Are you fucking kidding me?! You're a man, so frankly I'm not surprised, but let me explain; no, campaign etiquette does not change because McCaskill is a female but the fact is women who run for political office face massive amounts of sexist dialogue during their campaigns - remember Hillary in '08? Akin frequently refers to McCaskill in childish and downplayed terms such as "gal," and uses misogynistic language in his public discourse. Listen to his stump speech and you will be barraged with male-centered dialogue that only references females in relation to men, housework, or families. It was sexist for him to say it was unladylike for her to be an aggressive debater, but she never compared him to a dog, which is an offensive analogy and hits harder when you're a female who frequently faces this shit. Oh, wait, you're not a female who constantly faces this shit so never mind. 

Jeff Wiegand
Jeff Wiegand

How many poor analogies does this guy get? SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

Now Trending

St. Louis Concert Tickets

From the Vault