Top

blog

Stories

 

National Science Ed Center on Anti-Evolution Bill: "Last Thing Missouri Teachers Need"

Categories: Education

Thumbnail image for Rep Rick Brattin.jpg
via Facebook
The Missouri legislature is getting national attention again -- and not exactly the good kind. As we reported last week, Representative Rick Brattin, a Republican, is pushing a proposal to mandate that "intelligent design" be taught in all Missouri schools alongside evolution, telling us that he's a "huge science buff," who believes different origin theories should get equal treatment. His comments got him some love from Mother Jones magazine, and now the National Center for Science Education is weighing in. Unsurprisingly, they aren't pleased.

"This is the last thing Missouri teachers need," says Eugenie Scott, executive director of NCSE. "Particularly since his definition and understanding of allegedly scientific defintions are simply wrong."

House Bill 291, called the Missouri Standard Science Act, as we outlined last week, would mandate that textbooks covering any scientific theory of biological origin devote equal treatment to evolution and intelligent design.

creationism controversy.jpeg
via ncse.com

It goes into close detail about how evolution must be presented based on the interpretation of "theory" and "hypothesis" that he lays out in the bill, and the legislation mandates specifics on how schools should go about changing their curricula and textbooks.

"He's defining scientific subjects that teachers are then directed to teach," Scott tells Daily RFT. "This is just unprecedented."

Her group works to defend the teaching of evolution and climate change in schools across the country.

While Brattin told us that his legislation is not about religion or creationism, Scott says it's pretty obvious what he's trying to do and that he is relying on past creationist literature to explain it. She points to his use of "naturalistic means" in the bill, in which he argues that the "theory" of evolution assumes a natural origin and thus excludes other possible "intelligent design" scenarios. The bill, full version on view below, says:

"Biological evolution", a theory of the origin of life and its ascent by naturalistic means. The first simple life was developed from basic elements and simple molecules through the mechanisms of random combinations, naturally occurring molecular structures, other naturalistic means, and millions of years. From the first simple life, all subsequent species developed through the mechanisms of random variation, mutation, natural selection, adaptation, segregation, other naturalistic means, and millions of years. The theory is illustrated by the evolutionary phylogenic tree. Theory philosophically demands only naturalistic causes and denies the operation of any intelligence, supernatural event, God or theistic figure in the initial or subsequent development of life.

So while Brattin is presenting it as an "equal treatment" bill, if you read between the lines, Scott says it's clear that the intent here would be to actually remove evolution entirely from the curriculum -- given that it defines evolution as a theory that excludes others/

"He has...a confused understanding of how science works," says Scott.

Continue for more of our interview with Eugenie Scott and for a full draft of the bill.



Sponsor Content

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...