Matthew Pellegrini: In Surprise Move, Judge Rejects Plea Deal in High-Profile Shooting Case

Since the plea agreement was signed, Joyce has twice issued statements saying that she is very sympathetic to the family's suffering and that this is a rare occasion in which the prosecutors and victim's family do not agree on the best course of action.

The case next heads to Judge Bryan Hettenbach for a May 7 plea hearing in which Beindorff's attorneys could accept a similar plea agreement to the one Sweeney rejected today or the judge could offer him a different sentence that the defendant could then accept or decline. (Editor's note: This has been updated with new details from the Circuit Attorney's Office).

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Matthew Pellegrini 2.jpg
Courtesy of Tami Inkley
Tami Inkley and her son.

Inkley says that this gives Joyce a chance to live up to her statements of sympathy and ensure justice this time around.

"Now it's back in her hands," she says. And given that this kind of rejection is unusual, she adds, "We are feeling hopeful."

Daily RFT left a message with Beindorff's public defender, who has generally not commented in the ongoing trial. We'll update if we hear back.

Update, 2:25 p.m.: Susan Ryan, spokeswoman for the Circuit Attorney's office tells us, "We respect Judge Sweeney's decision and we will move the case onward in front of Judge [Bryan] Hettenbach."

Here's Joyce'srecent statement on the case followed by the plea deal rejected today and some of the family's formal impact statements.

Jennifer Joyce Statement

Plea Agreement Kevin Beindorff

Tami Inkley

Angelo Pellegrini

Beckie Bowlin

Send feedback and tips to the author. Follow Sam Levin on Twitter at @SamTLevin.

My Voice Nation Help
3 comments
Christina Wojtanowski
Christina Wojtanowski

Im sick of the f**Kin injustice in this city!!... Im sick of excuses...!!...

ThatsMyTattooo
ThatsMyTattooo

Seeing the prosecuting and defense attorney smiling, and practically skipping off the elevator arm in arm together after the hearing leads me to believe Ms. Gilliam is more concerned about maintaining a positive relationship with the handsome defense attorney, rather than protecting the rights of the victim, the dead victim in this case. Batting her eyelashes at him was telling enough. Shame on her & the entire circuit court. I commend Sweeney for his fortitude & only wish the circuit attorneys office had half as much reverence for the law. Gillian's statement in court was also telling, when she heard the judge had rejected the plea, her "no way! no way!" SAYS IT ALL. She is NOT working for the victim here. For shame, shame on all but Sweeney. He can go home & face himself in the mirror tonight.

Now Trending

St. Louis Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...