Top

blog

Stories

 

Cupples 7: City Says Historic St. Louis Site Will Be Demolished Unless a Developer Steps Up

cupples-7.jpg
via stlouis-mo.gov
Cupples 7.
Unless a developer steps up, the historic Cupples 7 building in downtown St. Louis will soon be demolished.

And even if developers do emerge, they would need to have a solid plan to stabilize the site immediately -- or else it will have to come down. So says the city, which doesn't own the site, but has determined that the structure has become a serious safety hazard.

Still, the mayor's office and local preservationists are still hoping that someone -- with funding and a plan -- comes forward.

"We will welcome them until the wrecking ball swings," Maggie Crane, spokeswoman for Mayor Francis Slay, tells Daily RFT.

Will anyone be able to stop the demolition?

See also:
- Pevely Dairy: After Long Fight, Why Doesn't Saint Louis University Have a Plan?
- Missouri Preservation Announces Most Endangered Historic Places
- St. Louis Shuts Down Streets Around Crumbling Cupples 7 Landmark

As quick background, Cupples 7 is a seven-story brick building and the only structure in the historic Cupples Station complex that has not been renovated. That complex was constructed by Eames and Young for Samuel Cupples between 1894 and 1917. The buildings are on the National Register of Historic Places, but Cupples 7 -- on 11th and Spruce streets -- was condemned by the city in 2008.

Now, city officials say, it poses a serious risk and needs to be stabilized immediately or be torn down.

That means that the city has two requests for proposals out now: one for a development plan to save Cupples 7 and another to demolish it. The latter, released yesterday, seems to be the more likely course of action. Demolition could happen in early June.

cupples-7-google-maps.jpg
via Google Maps
Cupples 7.

The city does not own the building, but, Crane tells us, "we are trying to be good stewards of public money, public trust and public safety."

In a statement sent out yesterday, Slay -- who recently wrote on his blog about his desire to see Cupples 7 stay alive -- says:

Public safety is driving this decision. Cupples 7 did not have a good winter, and City engineers believe it is now an imminent danger. They are afraid it will collapse and hurt someone....

It will only be too late once the proverbial wrecking ball swings. If a developer is out there, this is the last moment to come forward.

Officially, building commissioner Frank Oswald has declared an "emergency condition," for the site with the demolition notice released yesterday. The full document is below.

Ballpark Lofts III, headed by developer Kevin McGowan, owns the property, but all plans to redevelop it have been unsuccessful. And previous efforts to demolish the site have also failed, because of the site's historic status.

cupples-map.jpg
via stlouis-mo.gov
Site map from city's RFP.

But now it's too much of a risk, the city says. And engineers estimate it will take anywhere from $4 to $8 million to "eliminate the hazard." Further, the current street closures surrounding Cupples 7 are a burden on surrounding properties and businesses, according to the city.

Andrew Weil, executive director of the Landmarks Association of St. Louis, tells Daily RFT that, unfortunately, it seems like a lost cause at this point.

"The city bodies that were tasked with protecting buildings like this did everything within their power," he says. (The mayor's office notes that city leaders have tried since last November to find a viable buyer who could fortify the historic building and eliminate the danger. They've had no luck.)

Continue for more commentary from Andrew Weil and copies of the relevant documents in this case.


My Voice Nation Help
11 comments
Sharon Walker
Sharon Walker

Cold have one floor dedicated to St. Louis/and surrounding area based businesses to display what their impact is on this area. Would be great advertisement space. That would bring some much needed $ to upkeep the building.

Sharon Walker
Sharon Walker

Make it a building that serves as a United Cities building. This would give all the neighboring cities that surround St. Louis a presence in the city. Those cities would pay for the renovations to their section. So many surrounding cities residents travel to the city to spend money and enjoy the attractions...How about reversing some of that? Each city would buy one or two rooms to represent their part of the surrounding areas of St. Louis in the name of tourism. Give a brief history, attractions, location, and other details about their town/city. St. Louis is supported so much by outside dollars...maybe it is time to return the favor. Would be an excellent educational opportunity for everyone as well. The center of the building should have one section dedicated to the Mississippi River. This section would emphasize how important the river is to the city both yesterday, today, and in the future. I would visit a building like that. I would love to learn about all the places that are in driving distance from my home to take a few day trips and explore things. I believe it would become a culturally valuable thing to the city.

Thee Lovingcup
Thee Lovingcup

I remember restoring Cupples buildings in the late 90s and early 2000s... there was nothing down there before... every building in the Cupples complex has been restored except 7. I think you are being a little shortsighted yourself, not remembering the past

Thee Lovingcup
Thee Lovingcup

a potentially wonderful building needs to go? Why? If every building in StL that sat vacant for years was demo'ed, we wouldn't have the wonderful buildings you speak of...

David Dwars
David Dwars

Maybe a nice surface parking lot. We don't have nearly enough of those. Also the resulting heat island effect is nice on those cold winter nights. Not so much during Cardinal season though.

Eric Matthew Wilkinson
Eric Matthew Wilkinson

I was in Denver and was struck by just how livable it was around their baseball stadium. It is sad how shortsighted St. Louis is. I find it fascinating that we can have so many empty lots and abandoned buildings in what should be prime real estate.

Brenda Hamilton
Brenda Hamilton

Having walked past this building for years. Knock. It. Down. As much as restored buildings can be wonderful, this one needs to go.

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...