Will Missouri Block Federal Gun Control? Dems Pressure Jay Nixon To Veto Nullification Bill

gov-jay-nixon-signing-250.jpg
via
Governor Jay Nixon.
The Missouri legislature's push to block the enforcement of federal gun laws, as we noted last week, has been cast as one of the most extreme states' rights movements in the country. At this point, the success of this controversial GOP effort hinges on whether Governor Jay Nixon, a Democrat, will issue a veto blocking the measure. In recent weeks, the governor has been approving and rejecting bills, but it's uncertain if or when he might veto the anti-gun control measure.

Still, Democratic lawmakers this week are increasing pressure on Nixon, who has until July 14 to make a decision on the most "hardcore Second Amendment bill" in the country, as one Republican backer has called it.

See also:
- Missouri Legislature Passes Bills Blocking Federal Gun Control, Sharia Law, U.N
- Does Missouri Have "Most Extreme" States' Rights Push With Gun Bill?
- Missouri's Approved Gun Bills: Concealed-Carry Permits Easier to Get

"There are a million reasons [to veto the bill] and the first one being that it is totally unconstitutional," State Rep. Stacey Newman, a vocal pro-gun control Democrat, tells Daily RFT. "We do not need an unconstitutional law."

Newman yesterday delivered petitions signed by more than 4,000 Missouri residents that she says represents 425 zipcodes across the state urging Nixon to block the measure, House Bill 436, the so-called Second Amendment Preservation Act.

The lengthy bill would make it illegal to enforce any federal gun policies that violate constitutional rights to bear arms, which critics say is legally very problematic. The bill's backers argue that federal policies that aim to create stricter gun laws are not constitutional, even if the president says they are. Either way, this preemptive measure could very well open up Missouri to a costly legal battle.

stacey-newman-petitions.jpg
Courtesy of Newman
Stacey Newman with the [corrected] constituent services director in the governor's office yesterday.

Newman points out that Attorney General Eric Holder has made it clear, in a letter to Kansas, which implemented a similar measure, that his office will pursue litigation against states that contradict federal law in this way.

Holder wrote:

In purporting to override federal law and to criminalize the official acts of federal officers, [Kansas Senate Bill] 102 directly conflicts with federal law and is therefore unconstitutional. Federal officers who are responsible for enforcing federal laws and regulations in order to maintain public safety cannot be forced to choose between the risk of a criminal prosecution by a state and the continued performance of their federal duties.

Newman says it's clearly a waste of time for Missouri to head down the same path (with a bill that passed 116-38, meaning Republicans could potentially override a veto).

The bill also contains controversial language about the use of firearms in schools and could put in place restrictions on First Amendment rights regarding the publishing of gun owners' names, according to some critics.

"It's trying to do anything but address gun violence," says Newman, who introduced a gun control measure in the legislature to implement universal background checks in Missouri. "We are seeing what's going on in St. Louis and Kansas City weekly.... It snubs the gun violence victims."

rep-casey-guernsey-with-gun.jpg
via Facebook
Rep. Casey Guernsey, a supporter of the measure.

Nixon's office has been flooded with messages regarding this bill, many urging him to sign it into law, according to an Associated Press report from earlier this month.

Newman argues that most Missourians don't want to waste resources on an embarrassing law like this. "We've got citizens throughout the entire state of Missouri that are very concerned and in opposition to this."

She adds, "We're done being the comedy state."

Here's the petition letter and the final version of the bill on Nixon's desk.

Dear Governor Nixon,

The legislature sent HB436 to Governor Jay Nixon's desk earlier this spring. Called "the nation's most extreme gun protection bill' by Huffington Post, Missouri HB436 would nullify all federal gun laws, criminalize law enforcement who try to enforce them and allow certain teachers to bring guns into schools. It goes even further and would allow those teachers to be fired if they ever happen to forget to bring their firearm(s) to school.

HB436 is a unconstitutional hard core NRA bill which must be vetoed.

Last month Kansas Gov. Brownback signed into law a similar nullification proposal and promptly received a warning letter from U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder threatening legal action. Missouri cannot and must not follow suit.

Most importantly, HB436 does nothing to protect our communities or kids against senseless gun violence. It's time for leaders to refocus on common sense legislation to end gun violence and save lives.

House Bill 436

Send feedback and tips to the author. Follow Sam Levin on Twitter at @SamTLevin.

My Voice Nation Help
9 comments
OneLung
OneLung

It doesn't mater if he veto's it or not, there is a solid veto proof majority for this Bill in both the House and the Senate. Newman knows this, she's just grandstanding.

Sharon Walker
Sharon Walker

They are misguided. The emphasis should be on treating mental illness with some dignity instead of forcing that patient population to fend for themselves in the streets. We also need to have harsher sentences for repeat offenders known to be gang affiliated. Responsible gun owners are not going to give up their rights just because the system has failed to do it's job to combat crime and refuses to treat mental illness patients with the dignity that they deserve.

Kenneth Snyder
Kenneth Snyder

I say that if you're going to call something hardcore second amendment, it should include the requirement of being in a well regulated militia.

Ryan Stufft
Ryan Stufft

I like how MO lawmakers act like they have big balls by openly defying our overall government when in fact they are just wasting tax payers money on something that will get overruled by SCOTUS. Gun owners can whine all they want, but really there is too much of a good thing and people are dying as a result of lack of regulation.

SkylerCuno
SkylerCuno

@Kenneth Snyder the people are the militia, if they don't have weapons to form said militia then the militia can never be... the national guard is NOT the militia... it is in fact a form of military.... the militia is in fact meant to fight at home if the national guard was militia they wouldn't be getting sent over seas.. like they are... booom

SkylerCuno
SkylerCuno

@Ryan Stufft oh really? read that article that came out by the FBI saying more guns cause less crime? ahahahahahaha in your face anti gun cry baby!

gators52__20
gators52__20

@Ryan Stufft Exactly right, that's why in Britain, gun crimes have more than doubled in the last 15 years, due to the fact that taking guns away from law abiding citizens insures that criminals will not use guns in a crime.  Isn't that right?  Wait no, actually it isn't correct at all...

SkylerCuno
SkylerCuno

@Barry D Willingham veto proof bill! ahaha will get passed either way!

Now Trending

St. Louis Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...