Top

blog

Stories

 

St. Louis One Step Closer To Legalizing Sale, Distribution Of Condoms, Ending 1934 Law

Categories: News, Sex

trojan-condom.jpg
via
Forget saggy pants! Did you know that in the city of St. Louis, it's illegal to sell or distribute condoms. That is, according to a law passed in 1934 that is for some bizarre reason still on the books today.

"I don't think we should be criminalizing handing out condoms," Alderman Shane Cohn tells Daily RFT.

Cohn has formally introduced a bill to repeal a law that, for starters, technically means the city's own health officials are regularly breaking the law.

See also:
- St. Louis Men Have No Reason to Be Ashamed of Their Penis Size
- Used Condoms Can't Keep Charles Jaco Off Air, but KTRS Can
- 'Fight McCain, Have Sex': Free Condoms Go Quickly at Debate

This should be a pretty easy one to pass, Cohn says. "I don't think it's all that controversial."

The absurdly outdated ordinance that he is trying to throw out says:

It shall be unlawful to sell or offer for sale, or give away, within the City, any contraceptive or sex-inciting device or contrivance or any prophylactic rubber goods or prophylactic membranes or to own or be in charge of any vending machine dispensing any such article or to be in charge of any premises where such vending machine is maintained or where any such device is displayed or is dispensed by any means whatsoever.

In other words...no condoms!

shane-cohn-file.jpg
Shane Cohn.

Unless, the ordinance says, the condoms are coming from "registered and licensed physicians, duly registered pharmacists, or to wholesale druggists, jobbers or manufacturers who sell to the retail drug trade."

The punishment for violating the ordinance? You could be "guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars or by imprisonment in the workhouse for not more than ninety days."

Cohn says his proposal is the shortest one he has ever written: "An Ordinance to repeal Ordinance 40429, approved December 14, 1934, relating to the regulation and restriction of prophylactics."

"I'm sure there are many things that need to be updated in the city of St. Louis," Cohn tells us, "but this one was brought to my attention."

He says that officials with the city health department, which does give out condoms, would prefer not to engage in an outlawed practice.

"They want to make sure they are in compliance with the law," Cohn says.

condoms-file.jpg
via

Any organizations or businesses that sell or give away condoms would technically be breaking the law in St. Louis right now.

Cohn brought forward the bill in a health committee at the board of aldermen yesterday, which, unsurprisingly, approved it unanimously. If all goes as planned, the repeal of the condom ban should eventually make it to the mayor's desk.

Cohn says he's not aware of any other alderman making a motion to repeal the obsolete law in the past.

Still, he says, "Our own city health department is in violation.... We need to get that updated."

Here's a copy of the very short board bill:

Board Bill

Send feedback and tips to the author. Follow Sam Levin on Twitter at @SamTLevin.

My Voice Nation Help
20 comments
Sharon Walker
Sharon Walker

gotta say....im a big supporter of not getting the elephants drunk....once they get a snoot full,... the place can turn into a circus. Think about it.

Sharon Walker
Sharon Walker

FINALLY i kin git dem dere condamns witout getn erested! imma be eble ta cary water frum da crick!

Belle E Flopp
Belle E Flopp

And what about the younger generations Steve. U gotta start somewhere. Can't just continue to make the same mistakes because "nothing will change". If you do nothing certainly nothing will ever change

Belle E Flopp
Belle E Flopp

People that aren't allowed to buy condoms can now buy condoms.... yea I assume some will start using them.

Steve Mincer
Steve Mincer

ya...because people that don't wear condoms are suddenly going to, huh? what color is your unicorn today?

Paul Mealus
Paul Mealus

We need Kevin Bacon to break this city loose... foot loose.

Catherine Claire
Catherine Claire

Why bother? The Supreme Court made this point moot. So I am much more concerned about the inability to use clothes lines, having a claw foot tub being illegal, not being allowed to live with 3 people/women to whom I am not related (the Brothel Law - all dorms are prohibited!), not being able to frighten a baby, and the prohibition of getting elephants drunk. Heck, in some counties in Missouri, no one is allowed to dance. And if you don't dance, then you're no friend of mine...

Liz Hughes Wiley
Liz Hughes Wiley

Imagine that: passing laws that tried to control what private citizens did in their own bedrooms. Gosh, so glad we never do that anymore.......

jbradhicks
jbradhicks

Laws against contraceptives were overturned decades ago by the US Supreme Court in 1965 Griswold v Connecticut, so the law isn't doing any harm. But, yeah, if they have a minute to spare for it, bringing St. Louis law into compliance with the US Constitution wouldn't be a bad thing to do.

Andee Rose Shymama Gagliano
Andee Rose Shymama Gagliano

uhm, in my BIO Human Sexuality course last semester, we learned that STL is the STI capital in the US. and we are the highest rate for gonorrhea. so wtf?

Marc Seleman
Marc Seleman

I had no idea. Makes sense considering the size of the catholic community.

Now Trending

St. Louis Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...