James Crocker: Evidence Shows Float Trip Shooter Was Attacked, Injured, Says Lawyer

jim-crocker-mug.jpg
Police photo
James Crocker in photo released by police.
Evidence clearly shows that James Crocker, the suspect in the tragic float-trip fatality last month, was attacked and injured prior to the deadly shooting. That's according to Crocker's attorneys who are looking to cast doubts on the prosecution's second-degree murder charge as the case moves forward this month.

One example: The widely published mugshot of Crocker (on view to the right) released by police immediately after the shooting was not taken after the incident, says Michael Bert, the suspect's attorney.

"There is no way it could've been taken that day," he tells Daily RFT. "He sustained injuries to his head and arm. There is no question he felt threatened for his life."

See also: Woman Who Called 911 After Float Trip Shooting Says James Crocker Was "Very Calm"

Bert says he has clear photos of Crocker's injuries taken from jail, which he will use in trial.

Crocker, a 59-year-old Steelville man, got a lot of media attention for shooting and killing 48-year-old Paul Dart Jr., who was on a Meramec River weekend float trip with his wife and large group of family members. Police, based on testimony from some on the float trip, including Dart's widow, say that the group stopped at the gravel bar by Crocker's home, because one man had to urinate and another wanted to get a drink. When Crocker, who was armed, asked them to leave, an argument erupted and he ended up firing a shot straight at Dart, who died soon thereafter, police say.

james-crocker-2.jpg
Courtesy of Michael Bert
James Crocker.

As his second-degree murder trial moves through the process, Crocker's attorneys, as we noted in an interview earlier this month, are arguing that it was a case of self-defense and that there was a very rowdy, intoxicated crowd attacking the homeowner with large rocks while trespassing on his clearly marked private property.

Since our last report, there has been a preliminary hearing and a bond-reduction hearing. In the latter hearing, which took place last Wednesday, a judge denied Crocker's request for a reduction in the $650,000 bond. That means he will remain behind bars as the case advances.

Daily RFT got a chance recently to speak with Bert, who shared with us some photos of the scene and the police report -- along with his thoughts on the prosecution's initial argument at the preliminary hearing. Combined, he says, it's obvious that Crocker was a victim in this case and had a legal right to defend himself.

The accounts from police and witnesses -- some excerpts on view below -- meanwhile offer a picture of a chaotic and tense scene before and after the shooting.

Thumbnail image for loretta-dart-paul-dart.jpg
via KSDK
Loretta and Paul Dart.

"He was clearly injured," says Bert. "By all accounts, he had blood all over him."

That includes, Bert says, the direct account from a trooper who apprehended him.

According to Bert, the troopers arrested Crocker after he ran to the home of a neighbor who called 911, and left him handcuffed without allowing him to receive medical attention, which he had requested.

The rocks that the group used to attack him were very large, says Bert. Here's one photo he sent Daily RFT for scale:

rocks-float-trip.jpg
Courtesy of Michael Bert
Rocks along the Meramec River by Steelville where the shooting happened.

Bert also argues that the property has a very visible "Keep Out" sign, which the float trip party ignored. Here's one photo of the land and the sign Bert passed along:

james-crocker-keep-out.JPG
Courtesy of Michael Bert

Bert argues that the preliminary hearing testimony from a husband and wife on the trip (separate from the Darts) was very inconsistent and reflects the prosecution's weak case. He claims their presented timelines of the incident and their descriptions of Crocker's actions don't line up at all.

"The version of events I heard from those two witnesses was wildly contradictory," he says. "We're going to hear a lot of stories. It sounds like they are trying to cover their tracks for a big day of partying on the river."

He also claims that one of the witnesses in court essentially admitted to threatening Crocker with rocks.

Bert also argues that the police investigation was inadequate -- that officers, for example, failed to properly secure the crime scene. "It was shoddy police work. These were not experienced detectives."

james-crocker-3.jpg
Courtesy of Michael Bert
James Crocker.

And then there's the issue of the old photograph sent to media; Bert says he is not sure where that image came from, but he says he is confident it was not taken that day and that its use thus far has been misleading.

Daily RFT left a message for Crawford County sheriff Randy Martin. We'll update if we hear back. A representative from the Crawford county prosecutors says the office will not be commenting as the case is pending.

"It's been my contention all along that he acted to protect his property," Bert continues. "He was not only protecting his property, but he was acting out of fear for his life and for bodily injury."

Crocker, who is from the Ozarks and works for a plastic manufacturing company, is "eager to get on with his life," Bert says. "He just wants to get back to being outside. He just wants to get back to work."

Bert argues that the suspect has a lot of supporters in Crawford County and that he is a well-liked neighbor. Crocker is, in fact, often friendly with passersby on float trips, his attorney says.

"He likes interacting with respectable people who come through," says Bert.

Below are a handful of excerpts from the Crawford County Sheriff's Office formal reports along with more photos. To start, here is the testimony from some witnesses via the officer' reports (sic all):

Regina...stated in her statement that on July 20th while canoeing that her party stopped on a gravel bar waiting for friends where we found a man saying to get off his property he'll shoot, firing a warning shot with her husband standing near. Regina stated she and Paul started walking up explaining were not here for any reason, we weren't on his property. Regina stated when he fired another shot just missing me braising my arm, I thought I was hit but then thought it was an air gun. Regina stated she stood back up when he pointed the gun in Paul's face. Regina stated Paul put his hands up and took a step back and the man shot Paul in the face. Regina stated she then realized it was real and really happening. Regina stated that as Paul fell back She tried catching him and tried keeping the blood from coming out. Regina stated that her husband chased the car (A black and yellow mustang) up the road to the man's house who shot him. Regina stated we was never on his property and tried talking reason to the man...

Continue for more testimony from the police report, including from Paul Dart's wife, Loretta.

My Voice Nation Help
21 comments
KingdoGoodbomber
KingdoGoodbomber

what a stupid redneck.  probably protecting his meth lab and his still.

Bryan H Roberts
Bryan H Roberts

If he had time to fire warning shots, why were people still there to shoot? And how do you shoot someone in the face if they are retreating? Again, I am not saying this guy should have shot anyone, he is def at fault for taking it to that level, but why did these people find the need to continue to harass this guy and not move on down the river? I am a big outdoorsmen, and go on numerous float trips every year, I have encountered alot of nice people, and alot of a-holes on the river(both floaters and land owners). The best choice for anyone that comes across an angry landowner is to just move along, plenty of other land to pee on down river!

Chelsy McInnis
Chelsy McInnis

There's other places to shoot someone that aren't nearly as lethal as shooting them in the face.

Lanie Dattilo
Lanie Dattilo

A rock and a gun don't have the same impact. What a moron.

Thee Lovingcup
Thee Lovingcup

If he had time to fire warning shots he wasn't in immediate fear of his life. Almost everything Mr. Crocker did was wrong with respect to self defense.

Bryan H Roberts
Bryan H Roberts

I am sure anyone would reach a boiling point if every weekend when you want to relax and enjoy your property, a bunch of drunk a-holes show up and urinate on your property. Not saying that shooting someone is the right thing to do, but if he was attacked then he has every right to defend himself and his property.

Mike Shryock
Mike Shryock

Lawyer says he has a calm demeanor. By the looks of the keep out signs that would be highly suspect. Yes alcohol was involved, that is a given on the rivers and lakes of Missouri. If you own property on a popular river there will be times when you will meet people that are not exactly polite, especially with alcohol involved. But the people that live there are there because they are don't want people to know what they are doing. I don't see any big houses along rivers, but I do see a lot of shacks and rusty vehicles and junk. They live there because they don't want to go by the rules everyone else has to. Most are Doomsday Preppers. Lots of guns, ammo, beer, confederate flags and stupidity. Must have been something he didn't want people to see if he is willing to kill people for it.

Meg Ante
Meg Ante

What I /really/ want to know is what the judge and jury of Facebook think.

Matt Hay
Matt Hay

So, is that a fake date in the lower right hand corner of the mug shot as well? I guess Mr. Bert missed that.

Gym Segr
Gym Segr

We should go on a canoe trip! The same kind as Deliverance!

Andrew D'Angelo
Andrew D'Angelo

Everyone has a duty to protect their meth lab location! I seriously doubt his "property" is worth all that much anyway.

Matt Ferch
Matt Ferch

I have a hunch he'll be getting on with his life from prison.

Ryan Mackley
Ryan Mackley

In one statement posted by the deceased's wife, she says that they advanced to wrestle the gun away from him. The clear simple solution is to get your ass back in your raft and float on down the river. The neighbor had also stated there is a history of this behavior from the floaters. She also stated that Mr Crocker had a calm demeanor and not the crazed look that was described by the floaters with the deceased. The property lines may be debated but not the actions of those involved. Those floaters should have moved on and called authorities if they felt unjustifiably threatened .

Richard Griffin
Richard Griffin

really, the guy who is paid to be on his side says that? ;-)

Rebekah Wedick
Rebekah Wedick

Harry Styron, this story is still relevant...where are you?

Andy Crossett
Andy Crossett

Think we need to hear all the evidence. I don't know the defendant or the victims.

Thee Lovingcup
Thee Lovingcup

James should get the death penalty, his land donated to be a day area for floaters to stop and use a bathroom.

Kellie Sage Hurst
Kellie Sage Hurst

He was not attached or threatened by the man he shot and killed. I believe in protection however this man left the area and returned with a gun to shoot someone. It was premeditated. He could have called for help instead of going back to Murder. Simple! This is cut and dry.

Now Trending

St. Louis Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

General

Loading...