Top

blog

Stories

 

Top 5 Highlights of Mangia Mobile's Official Response to Mangia Italiano

Categories: This Just In
mangiamobilelogo.JPG
Law students seeking models of sober legal rhetoric might skip over the memorandum recently filed by Al Watkins, attorney for the food truck Mangia Mobile. The pleading represents his official response to the trademark infringement lawsuit brought by brick-and-mortar restaurant Mangia Italiano (3145 South Grand Blvd; 314-664-8585).

Some highlights:

1) The very first sentence of the 22-page filing, which reads, "Alex, Thomas and Catherine Daake are the siblings three." A footnote adds: "Not to be confused with Copyrighted children's book The Siblings Four, authored by counsel for Defendant and available for purchase through Defendant's counsel's office." Sigh.

2) Italian proverbs sprinkled throughout. For example, Watkins believes that if the restaurant really cared about the harm it now claims to be suffering, it would've filed its suit much earlier. Thus, "Chi tace acconsente. (Translation: 'Silence gives consent.')"

By the way, Gut Check is no attorney but finds this argument a bit disingenuous. The months preceding the lawsuit were spent trying to reach an out-of-court settlement, not giving consent.

3) Quotes from Casablanca. There are two.

4) The following attempt to show a contradiction in Mangia Italiano's position:
Plaintiff goes to great lengths....to create distance between its products, which it confusingly classifies as "high quality" and Defendant's products which it classifies as "not Italian" and "fast food." Plaintiff cannot have its cannoli and eat it too. Either the products are similar or they are not.
5) A little ribbing of his own clients, before setting the record straight on who they are:
Plaintiff is correct that Catherine Daake is "highly sophisticated," though her siblings are believed to be possessed of some rather unsophisticated stories relating to Catherine's awkward teenage years. Sophistication issue aside, the sibling owners of Mangia Mobile had never heard of Plaintiff's restaurant prior to receiving the cease and desist letter issued by Plaintiff's prior counsel of record. Moreover, and relevance issue aside, neither Catherine nor her brothers live in a "gated community."
Here's the pleading in its entirety: Mangia Mobile Response Memo
My Voice Nation Help
5 comments
Bretonraoul
Bretonraoul

The "siblings three" are really nice people who created a good menu. They're not running a "brothel on wheels" to quote a jealous Yelp reviewer. At first, I too thought they were an extension of Mangia Italiano, but only after someone who actually heard of Mangia Italiano mentioned it to me. With all this publicity, how can there possibly be any brand confusion at this point?! Does Mangia Italiano want it's foot in the food truck craze? Are they beginning to realize no one really dines in their restaurant anymore? 

Local restaurants that are afraid of food trucks have just gotten lazy in their quality. Let these entrepreneurs keep these home grown food trucks rolling and up your quality and brand...ass.

Bill Cooper
Bill Cooper

So it looks like their defense is either "How could a bunch of fun-loving, wacky people possibly be in the wrong?" or "Clearly, we're idiots. Please take pity on us."

alex fritz
alex fritz

Silence gives consent: No longer just a defense for date rapists!

I Like Turtles
I Like Turtles

What is the Yelp reviewer jealous of? That they make crappy food?

Now Trending

From the Vault

 

Loading...