Top 5 Highlights of Mangia Mobile's Official Response to Mangia Italiano
1) The very first sentence of the 22-page filing, which reads, "Alex, Thomas and Catherine Daake are the siblings three." A footnote adds: "Not to be confused with Copyrighted children's book The Siblings Four, authored by counsel for Defendant and available for purchase through Defendant's counsel's office." Sigh.
2) Italian proverbs sprinkled throughout. For example, Watkins believes that if the restaurant really cared about the harm it now claims to be suffering, it would've filed its suit much earlier. Thus, "Chi tace acconsente. (Translation: 'Silence gives consent.')"
By the way, Gut Check is no attorney but finds this argument a bit disingenuous. The months preceding the lawsuit were spent trying to reach an out-of-court settlement, not giving consent.
3) Quotes from Casablanca. There are two.
4) The following attempt to show a contradiction in Mangia Italiano's position:
Plaintiff goes to great lengths....to create distance between its products, which it confusingly classifies as "high quality" and Defendant's products which it classifies as "not Italian" and "fast food." Plaintiff cannot have its cannoli and eat it too. Either the products are similar or they are not.5) A little ribbing of his own clients, before setting the record straight on who they are:
Plaintiff is correct that Catherine Daake is "highly sophisticated," though her siblings are believed to be possessed of some rather unsophisticated stories relating to Catherine's awkward teenage years. Sophistication issue aside, the sibling owners of Mangia Mobile had never heard of Plaintiff's restaurant prior to receiving the cease and desist letter issued by Plaintiff's prior counsel of record. Moreover, and relevance issue aside, neither Catherine nor her brothers live in a "gated community."Here's the pleading in its entirety: Mangia Mobile Response Memo