How A St. Louis Band's Zombie Obama T-Shirt Forced A Virginia Republican To Resign And Got The Attention Of The Secret Service

• Conservative punk rock? Isn't that an oxymoron? Lame...

• I like it when people have false teeth.  

• perhaps you should do your research before you make statements like that....DOH! http://www.teefury.com/archive/991/Zombama_Returns/

• That Jared fellow is just upset because his design didn't get any national attention and this band's did.  Perhaps that band is the one who came up with the design first and Jared thought that it may be too controversial so he tweeked it to his liking and came up with his design.  Needless to say it's pretty funny that any politician would think it was okay to use such a graphic image.  

• Basically all of the elements, with the notable exception of the gunshot, are taken from the ZOMBAMA design. It's a clear copy.

• looking closely at the pictures side-by-side, i'll definitely give you the flies. those are a little close for comfort; makes one wonder....

• It's a parody design. Exactly. When someone else copies a parody nearly note for note, THAT is a ripoff. Sure, my design would not exist without Fairey's to be based upon, but that's legally-fair parody. I did not copy and paste Fairey's and add elements of my own -- I redrew the entire thing from scratch. This other artist has obviously copied and pasted elements of Fairey's and mine and overlayed poorly-rendered elements of their own. All of the elements are the same, except they added the bullet hole and switched the exposed brain to the other side. That is not enough of a discrepancy to stand up in court as a legally protected separate work, yet the artist clearly copied my design in making his. I did not copy Fairey's design, I based my work on his.

• you don't read well. they did commission that art. the picture on the t-shirt and the "zombama" artwork that jared made are DIFFERENT PICTURES. similar, yes, but only because they were both making fun of the exact same original image (the campaign posters). the point is that zombies are popular, and it makes sense that two artists -- unbeknownst to one another -- had the same rather simple idea.

• Actually, it was commissioned to an artist, and though there may be similarities, it was an original. Anyway, I don't think the artist was financially compensated, so how is there any intellectual property claim? I mean, Unless you really want to go after a group of blue collar average joes to recoup the $50 (maybe) in profit they may made on the shirts 2 years ago, in a band that was around for a year (maximum). As far as you know, they have not trademarked it, so make you own shirts and sell them. It's called capitalism... 

• if they supposedly ripped you off, then what does that make your original "design parodying Shepard Fairey's Obama "Hope" poster and his "style" of art recycling" (which his was sued copyright infringement of an AP photo)? 

• It's not the idea that's in question. It's the fact that the true designer was blatantly ripped off and not given credit. The fact that the "musician" also claimed that they only had a limited print run of the shirts featuring art from an artists that they "commisioned" that in truth knew nothing about their art being used is an even bigger slap in the face.

• seems silly to call it a "ripoff". it's a simple enough idea, really, just a satire of the campaign posters. as if zombie shit isn't popular enough already nowadays....but i do agree that your design would not have resulted in this fallout.

• The zombie Obama design is actually a ripoff of my original ZOMBAMA design. I was smart enough to not feature a bullet hole in the President's forehead, though. If they'd have simply used the original and not settled for third-rate knockoffs, the Loudoun County GOP could have avoided all of this controversy and mess. www.beastpop.blogspot.com

TotalComments: 13