Crotching Whiskey at the Justin Bieber Concert and Getting Thrown Out: A Review

 @Paris1919 , had I referred to a dozen less known authors, you would not be able to connect to them. His name is recognized. You immediately know his works without me describing any of them. It is impossible for you call him a violent, torture soul. For someone you do not know, your disposition for prejudging would not allow their works to stand for any comparison. I can compare myself to Stephen King, as a man, as an author, as someone who writes fiction. Sure, Stephen King is masterful in his novels, but was he always that good? Maybe you should go dig up his first attempt at writing a story for others. You might not think so much of his abilities back then. Writing talents are learned through many attempts and corrections. Perhaps one of his first attempts you might consider him a sick slashing murderer, since you are quick to judge others. Who knows? But educated people can make comparisons of vastly different things to show a simple common link. Comparisons need not be of equals in all matters. I never said I was a great writer, never even said I was a good writer, and I may not even rise to the level of a lousy writer. But that does not mean I am not a writer of fiction - as is Stephen King. One thing in the tales I write, if a character opens a bottle of whiskey, you will know exactly when she gets whiskey on her breath. And that little writing mistake is what sent you googling in the first place. So perhaps we should be comparing the professional writer here to me the rank amateur I am.

 @Paris1919 , Stephen King includes scenes where human bodies are torn apart in grotesque violence. Does that make him a violent person? No. Yet if I write about a young man masturbating in front of a naked girl, your sexual repulsion to the scene hits the high mark (as did Keiko, btw, so you did relate to her), and you conclude that young man was me. Can you not see your lack of logic here? Two stories, one you claim is the author's fantasy, and the other is not. Yet you know nothing of either. Prejudge without the facts. Much easy for you to not be bothered with things like logic and reason. You apparently do not write stories yourself. Six chapters written ten years has you fixated. Ignore the hundreds of other stories. Many of women like yourself just beginning to realize they can be sexual and good at the same time. In fact, the time spent replying to you has given me many ideas for future tales for a young woman called Paris. But then again, I tend to write about intelligent and strong-willed women, so you probably will not relate to that fictional character.

 @Daniel_Hill , afaik, you are a professional writer, not an author. No quotation marks necessary. One might say you authored an article, but that is not the common usage. If you wish to be an author, be one. Good, bad, or repugnant. But when giving narratives, omitting details that provide a connection to a theme is unwise. You poured whiskey, and magically you had whiskey on your breath. Details omitted. Since the last time you mentioned an open container was in filling the flask, it is quite logical to assume that is when you consumed said whiskey. Had you just said, "We sat in the parking lot outside the arena drinking to gather the courage to go inside..." then all would have been much clearer to the reader. I'm a bit surprised your editor did not flag that before publishing, but perhaps RFT operates differently than normal respected publications.

 @Paris1919 , I think you must be asexual because you are afraid of sexuality. You cannot separate fact from fiction. You think because an author writes a story, that he is personally invested in the lifestyle, yet you never think that of Stephen King. You come to grand conclusion I must be since I laughed with some silly girls having fun. there is no connection between the two except in your little, limited, twisted mind. As far as your attitude towards 18 year old girls, I find completely abhorrent. You consider them so immature that no rational person with that attitude would allow them to vote. I am not a professional writer, but Daniel is. The expectation of a professional writer is much greater. He left out key information that others first spotted and questioned. Your defense of Daniel is admirable, but misguided. Daniel needs to improve his writing to continue as a professional writer. That is where your friendship to him should lead, not providing entertainment for "a repugnant, filthy old man."

 @Paris1919 , aha! Progress! Where did I say the WNBR was sexual in nature? You are finally admitting that nudity itself is not necessarily sexual. This fact shows you only made assumptions about the story I wrote ten years ago. This is especially true in that you consider the main character a dependent. Also, how is leaving a comment without address or link "contacting"? You are a very judgmental individual. No facts required. Do your employers, friends, and family know you stalk erotica writers? Read their stories? Engage in discussions with them? With snap judgments like yours, I need not ask about friends. So, you have no fantasies, you are an asexual being - living in a convent? oops, you might have a fantasy involving sex, and yet you talk to children? YIKES! You really can't take a step back and realize the total twisted hole you keep digging for yourself. Logic escapes you, and yet it is only logic that will open your eyes to reality. I'm rather enjoying this. and you?

 @Paris1919 , fiction writers are not attempting to grasp reality. You seem to have a difficult time understanding that basic definition of fiction. Stories of witches and vampires are not seeking reality. And stories of 18 year olds enjoying legal public exhibitionism are not reality either. Shakespeare, King, Daniel are writers. You may not enjoy my writings, but someone who writes is called a writer. As far as "an adult man" and a 18 year old girl go, you still have no concept of fiction writing. I consider a man of 18 plus a day a man. An adult. Legally able to vote in elections, serve in the military, and enter into contracts on his own. You seem to think females are not as capable of such adult behaviors. Is that based on your own experiences? Okay, let's try this again, with another common reality - Hugh Hefner posts pictures of naked girls in his magazine. Some of those females are teenagers, albeit 18 and 19, but still in their teens. Now, some subscribers to his magazine are in their 20's, 30's, 40's, 60's, and even maybe 80's. All creeps, right? Let's make this closer to home. RFT published photos of the World Naked Bike Ride where some riders were young adults, yet here we have editors and publishers pushing 60 years old. Creeps? These are the guys who sign Daniel's paychecks, so be careful. Are they all viewing every teenager as a sexual object, too? Maybe, just maybe, people view others in a much more complex way than you could ever imagine. A father can subscribe to Playboy without viewing his daughter as a centerfold or being accused of raping the neighborhood, unless of course, that father lives in your neighborhood.

 @Daniel_Hill , what you meant to write and what you wrote are two completely different things. As a writer, you must be able to proofread your own writing and discover that you were less than clear on the subject of when any whiskey was consumed. All we have on the subject is that the whiskey bottle was in your hands at home, and that there was whiskey on your breath at the building. Perhaps your revised version is accurate, perhaps you are covering your tracks. It no longer matters. The article was published without the necessary information to see what really happened, and any revision at this point is biased. REGARDLESS, driving over children and causing injuries and possible deaths is far worse than a fictional story of a 18 year old girl. And it is considerably worse than someone laughing with others being silly on a video published to the internet for all to see. Or will you start burning all your books and disconnect from the internet to keep yourself pure?

 @juliamxc , who knows? I probably click a link, that lead to a page with a link, that had a link, that showed more links, and there it was. Having been logged in under this username, the comment appeared using this username.  Have you ever played 6-degrees of Kevin Bacon? There is no doubt, someone could start with an internet bio of Kevin Bacon and still land on that same video. Now, go back and read the comment I left there - encouraging the girls to keep silliness a part of their life. Should we research your internet life and discover a funny dog clip comment and knowing you've have had sex once in your life tie you to bestiality based on that totally innocent comment on the dog video? Makes no sense. Yet that is the logic being applied.

 @Paris1919 , that story was published ten years ago. Written well before then. That would place my age at well, you have no clue. You continue to guess and make up facts to fit your preconceived visions.  Apparently, a bf and gf who are three days apart, suddenly become a sick couple the moment one is 18+day and the other is 18-day.  Now, let's further demonstrate your inability to grasp reality - a series of stories? Wrong one story, six chapters. I understand your need to feel you are right, but you need to accept your set of facts do not fit any reality here.  Coming of age stories are typical of writers from all ages. One does not have to 18 to write of an 18 year old. Do you think Stephen King enjoys torturing people because his books are about evil things happening to people? you have prejudged based on an extremely limited number of facts, and there is no way to change your mind. I need even ask who you plan to vote for president. You made up your mind years ago before even knowing who was running in the election. Facts are unnecessary things for you. 

 @Paris1919 , 18 years old is 18. HS or not. If living with mommy and daddy makes one asexual, there are plenty of young adults that you would disqualify form the voting booth, too. Obama declared 26 yr old still children for insurance. Are you ready to call anyone 26 or younger a child? Is this your position, that youth are asexual? So we can stop handing out condoms in schools. We can stop sex ed because, no child is ever sexual when in school or living at home? Is that what you really meant to say? Your argument breaks down from the start. You read one story of hundreds, and you are ready to make a snap judgment upon me based on your own personal adolescence. There is a world out there different from your own. Fictional writers explore those worlds and beyond. you are the one with an unhealthy attitude towards life. Yes, I did write one non-sexual comment on one video containing younger girls. God forbid you write a comment on a dog acting silly and get accused of bestiality - assuming you do have sex. I think you really need to go back with an open mind, or continue to write silly remarks that make no sense in light of the real facts. Keeping on doing so makes you a poster girl (girl) for not letting little girls vote. How sad is that.

 @Paris1919 , it would be best for you to stick to the facts, rather than just making things up. First of all, he did not clarify that he only drank from the car to inside. In fact, the article states he "crotched" his flask to making it to inside the building.Perhaps he drank sitting in the parked car, but no where is that claimed. So unless he ran a straw down his pants, I do not see where you get the idea he was drinking to get alcohol on his breath from his car to the concert.I called you ancient, not because of your age, but because of your attitude. You attitude is positively Victorian. A healthy human in the modern era can show their sexual side at appropriate times, and show themselves as non-sexual beings other times. Or is Obama kissing babies something that aghast you since he clearly has had sex with his wife? Oh, he didn't write about it. So that is the point? Sex is fine, just don't go writing about it if you ever look at a girl. You are just the type of person Kenny spoke about in the article when he said, "But I look like this." I'm betting you laughed at that joke while you spew hate at me. I can take it knowing your ancient attitude will eventually pass. My stories are about young women. You invented the young girls of 14 based on one comment encouraging that being silly is a good thing. That is your twisted mind weaving unrelated stories of young women to that single post because it was written by the same person. Unless you wish to claim 18 year olds are also young girls, and if so, why do we allow them to vote? Are you ready to take away the vote from anyone under 21 years old? (Do you see how twisting words and making up things can work?)

 @juliamxc  , I never questioned the drive home. I took Daniel at his written word about going to the concert. You see, I believe words mean things. Daniel stated he arrived with whiskey on his breath. I am not taking two totally unrelated posts from two totally separate websites and somehow tying them together in some libelous manner. I read this "professional" writer's article and took him at his word.That you live with Daniel and that you only just registered to defend him in this column speaks volumes to your loyalty as a friend, not as an impartial witness nor reviewer. But thank you for searching and reading my internet history.

 @Daniel_Hill  , when you have nothing to offer, correct the grammar. Sorry, I do not pay a editorial to proofread each post I make, but I thank you for doing so for free.

 @Paris1919 , not protesting. Just showing the weakness in your arguments. You think sexual beings cannot be asexual in other situations. How sad is that? And still, you have no issue with drunks bumping their way through pre-teens.

 @Paris1919 , you are old in the mind. Your age is just a number. You are ancient in your mind. Re-read the comment on the teens having fun - nothing sexual. Nothing other than children at play. You combine the thoughts in your dirty mind that a person who is sexual in one situation must be sexual in all situations. Let's assume you have sex at some point. Does that mean you cannot enjoy watching a funny video clip of a dog without being called a pervert engaging in bestiality? You are the one with sexual problems. That is what has made you old. Your ancient repressive feelings towards sex. As far as my erotic stories, the character is of age, even older than Juliette. I am not the Bard, but even Will started at some point. I'll never achieve his glory, but creative outlets is something you lack. Do try to distinguish between a fictional character and real life. You seem to have many issues with reality. You are right, adults drinking and driving in public around pre-teen girls is different than a fictional story. Perhaps there is hope for you yet.

 @Paris1919 , so you believe young teens should not post on the internet. Lock them away until they grow old like yourself. Nice. As far as me posting a comment to them, I guess you prefer only those who hide the fact that they enjoy sex to post comments. Nice. you prefer liars and people ashamed of themselves to post. Nice moral center you have there. You are seriously confused that someone who enjoys watching an exhibitionist is the same as someone who invades privacy by hiding cameras. How sad it is to not understand your own sexuality. How sad it is that you actually believe you have some sort of moral superiority. I enjoy life. You seem to be the bitter one who is ashamed of their sexuality. But shouldn't you be writing about two old white drunks sneaking whiskey into a crowd of pre-teen girls. You ask me to seek help for simply viewing a video, but you have no comment to those pushing themselves through crowds of girls while drinking. That is more interesting to me realizing your total confusion.

 @Paris1919 , are you Amish? No, you cannot be Amish. Amish are not so judgmental. So let me get this right, only 13 yr girls and boys should view a video placed out on youtube? Is that what you are saying? Short shorts? give me a break! Shorts and tie-dyed tees. They acted silly, and wanted feedback. I obligated encouraging them to stay young and silly - lest they grow old like you have. That I watch some porn does not deny me the right to post non-sexual, encouraging comments to others, too. Now, think, I know it is foreign to you, but do try to think. Perhaps I use this moniker for mostly porn related posts. Hence, you search on this moniker and what do you think the majority of the hits will be? Church sites? And yes, I attend services regularly, too. "Go forth and multiply." Nothing about being asexual. And since you have such an interest in my sexual preferences, you might have realize your lies as you typed them - I prefer naked women in public places. Much like... get this... the World Naked Bike Ride that was featured here at the RFT. Oh, dear, you are offended by such? And your ignorance is showing - watching a video (recorded) is not the same as a cam show (live). So please stop judging others when yourself is being judged by your own actions.

 @Paris1919 , oh my! I guess I wrote some erotica, visited Sexyandfunny  site, and espoused political views. And this matters because? Are you so closed minded to find these things unacceptable? And what does "Paris1919" show in a google search? That you are unimaginative and prefer to steal others creative works. Thanks for playing, "What's My Google? Tune in next time to see more embarrassing moments on the internet."

 @SlipperyDipper , whether I do or don't does not matter. You are the mean, cold-hearted person for even thinking of such to another human being. That places you outside the sphere of humane treatment towards others. Congratulations on showing more about yourself than anyone else with your post.

 @katie.jones.violin , no one in particular. I find fault where fault exists. I see no reason to heap false praise on those journalists that manage to contribute an average article. You do not know me. I have plenty of friends, and the circle is forever expanding. What you call bitter and whiney, many of my friends call cynical and blunt honesty. I thank you for taking the time to read my posts across all of RFT to learn something more about me.

 @Daniel_Hill nah, if you were done with me, you simply would not have replied. What you are done with is digging yourself a deeper hole. I'm good with that that. Have another shot, but stay off the roads, please.

 @Daniel_Hill , no problem. Try to convince everyone you didn't take some shots to get the courage to leave for the concert when pouring the whiskey into your flasks. You might find some people to believe that one. Z number 26 (a bit redundant lettering and number, dontcha think?) : Never questioned your tale of the Hard Rock Cafe in my post. AA number 27 (see how silly it becomes?): Better writing would leave us no reason to make assumptions. You are assuming I am assuming rather than making logical inferences from your previously stated narrative. Now, come clean - your article states you were "getting inside" not already "INSIDE" when you mentioned the smell of whiskey on your breath.